When Doug Crist was Bainbridge Review editor during the Darlene Kordonowy years, I had a lot of heartburn over his Kordonowy administration boosterism, particularly his favorable editorials about her Winslow Tomorrow program. I was also shocked when the Review accepted Jeffrey Sneller’s attack ad on Kim Brackett as she ran for City Council. When Dennis Anstine took the reins, I was relieved at the prospect of a more open-minded and down-to-earth editorial philosophy. But we didn’t get fairer reporting, just a different bias.
Here’s a copy of the letter I sent today to Anstine and his reporter Richard Oxley, with a cc to his bosses at Sound Publishing (including, ironically, Mr. Crist).
Dear Richard and Dennis:
I’ve had my disagreements with the Review over the years, particularly with the previous editor. But even as I disagreed with his editorial positions and the Review’s advertising decisions, I acknowledged and appreciated the editor’s skill as a writer and journalist. I am writing today over issues with the Review’s professionalism and journalistic standards.
Dennis, you’ve made no secret of your biases and loyalties in local politics, and you have every right to your opinions. Readers expect and want to see the views of the local newspaper on the opinion pages. Increasingly, though, you have let those opinions bleed into the news, which is quite apparent in your decisions about coverage, placement and quotes, among other reporting techniques. In the past month alone the Review has quoted Councilman Knobloch extensively in a report on a Council meeting discussion, even though Mr. Knobloch was not at the meeting.
You also posted an article about the “Knobloch memo” on your website, but did not include it in your print edition only a day or two later (I can’t pinpoint how long because your website has re-dated the article to 12/23.) Although you did not include the potentially unfavorable article about Mr. Knobloch, you ran a front page story about the public record request made by Councilman Bob Scales, with the lede, “Council member Bob Scales has filed a public records request involving fellow council member Bill Knobloch that targets his personal email accounts and private communications with various members of the Bainbridge Island community.”
This sentence reveals a jarringly ill-informed understanding of the Washington Public Records Act. I believe a good grasp of the principles of the PRA, which is used so often these days, is a fundamental requirement for any news organization, especially if it is writing about a records request.
In a nutshell, there is no such thing as “private communications” between community members and government officials involving the performance of a government function (unless they fall within one of the narrow exemptions of the Act). Even a records request itself is a public record. The Act covers all writings in any form, including public or private email, recordings, Facebook accounts, notes, etc. You can imagine the reason: open government would not be served if officials could circumvent the Act by hiding communications in personal accounts.
Continue Reading »